Basel, 10 July 2017
Positive phase III results for Roche’s emicizumab in haemophilia A published in The New England Journal of Medicine
- HAVEN 1 showed emicizumab reduced bleed rate by 87% compared with on-demand bypassing agents
- All 12 secondary endpoints in HAVEN 1 were positive, including an intra-patient comparison that showed emicizumab reduced bleed rate by 79% compared to prior prophylactic bypassing agents
- Data from HAVEN 1 in adults and adolescents and interim data from HAVEN 2 in children with haemophilia A with inhibitors are being presented today at the 26th International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress
- Data from both studies have been submitted to FDA and EMA for approval consideration
Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) today announced that data from HAVEN 1, a phase III study evaluating once-weekly subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis (preventative) in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A with inhibitors, were published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The primary endpoint showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction in treated bleeds of 87% (risk rate [RR]=0.13, p<0.0001) with emicizumab prophylaxis compared with on-demand (no prophylaxis; episodic use only) bypassing agents (BPAs). All 12 secondary endpoints were positive, including a statistically significant reduction of 79% (RR=0.21, p=0.0003) in treated bleeds in a first of its kind intra-patient analysis in a subset of patients comparing two prophylaxis regimens (emicizumab and BPAs). Data from HAVEN 1 as well as the interim analysis of the phase III HAVEN 2 study of emicizumab in children are being presented at the 26th International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress today.
“Nearly one in three people with haemophilia A develop inhibitors to standard factor VIII therapy, leaving them at greater risk of life-threatening bleeds and long-term joint damage,” said Sandra Horning, MD, Roche’s Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. “Based on the bleed reduction shown in the HAVEN 1 and HAVEN 2 studies, we believe emicizumab has the potential to make a meaningful difference for people with haemophilia A with inhibitors, while also reducing the burden of managing the condition with a subcutaneous, once-weekly administration.”
Further data from HAVEN 1 showed that, after a median observation time of 31 weeks, substantially more patients experienced zero bleeds with emicizumab prophylaxis than with on-demand BPAs across all bleed measurements, including zero treated bleeds (62.9% vs 5.6%), zero treated spontaneous bleeds (68.6% vs 11.1%), zero treated joint bleeds (85.7% vs 50.0%), zero treated target joint bleeds (94.3% vs 50.0%) and zero bleeds overall, which includes all treated and non-treated bleeds (37.1% vs 5.6%). A clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured at 25 weeks, using two validated instruments (Haem-A-QoL and EQ-5D-5L), was also observed.
In an additional study arm (Arm C, n=49), patients who had previously received BPA prophylaxis were treated with emicizumab prophylaxis. A subset of patients in this arm (n=24) had previously participated in a non-interventional study (NIS), allowing for a first of its kind intra-patient analysis comparing two prophylaxis regimens. This analysis showed a 79% (RR=0.21, p=0.0003) reduction in treated bleeds in patients receiving emicizumab compared with their prior BPA prophylaxis during the NIS. Data also showed that 70.8% of patients in this subset experienced zero treated bleeds with emicizumab prophylaxis whereas only 12.5% of these patients had experienced zero bleeds with their prior BPA prophylaxis during the NIS.
“The HAVEN 1 study is one of the most robust clinical studies conducted to date in people with haemophilia A with inhibitors to factor VIII, including a first ever intra-patient comparison to prior prophylaxis with bypassing agents,” said Professor Johannes Oldenburg, Institute of Experimental Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Bonn, Germany. “The reduction in bleeding events across all measures seen with emicizumab compared to either on-demand or prophylactic bypassing agents supports that it may be one of the most significant scientific innovations in the treatment of haemophilia A in over 30 years.”
Adverse events (AEs) occurring in 5% or more of patients treated with emicizumab were local injection site reactions, headache, fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection and joint pain (arthralgia). As previously reported, serious adverse events of thromboembolic events (TE) and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) occurred in two patients and three patients, respectively, while receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. The common aspect of these TMA and TE events is the patients were on emicizumab prophylaxis and received more than 100 u/kg/day of the BPA activated prothrombin complex on average for 24 hours or more before the onset of the event. Neither TE event required anti-coagulation therapy and one patient restarted emicizumab. The cases of TMA observed were transient, and one patient restarted emicizumab.
Interim results from the single arm HAVEN 2 study in children younger than 12 years of age with haemophilia A with inhibitors who received emicizumab prophylaxis are consistent with the positive results from the HAVEN 1 study. After a median observation time of 12 weeks, the study showed that only one of 19 children receiving emicizumab reported a treated bleed. There were no reported joint or muscle bleeds.
An intra-patient comparison (n=8) in a subset of these children who were previously enrolled in the NIS, showed that all experienced a 100% reduction in treated bleeds following treatment with emicizumab (previous annualised bleeding rate [ABR] ranged from 0 to 34.24); this group included seven children who had received prior BPA prophylaxis, and one who had received prior on-demand BPA. The data also indicate that the same dose of emicizumab is appropriate for children as for adults and adolescents, based on the levels of emicizumab in the blood (pharmacokinetics) of the children compared with the levels of emicizumab in the blood of adults and adolescents. The most common AEs with emicizumab in the HAVEN 2 study were mild injection site reactions and common cold symptoms (nasopharyngitis). No TE or TMA events were observed.
“Managing haemophilia A with inhibitors to factor VIII can be especially challenging for children and their caregivers. Not only can bleeding be difficult to control, but current treatments can require frequent intravenous infusions, which can often involve the long-term use of a central venous access device or port,” said Guy Young, MD, Director of Hemostasis and Thrombosis Program, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, and Professor of Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. “The HAVEN 2 interim results indicate that emicizumab may help prevent bleeding in children with inhibitors. Given the once-weekly subcutaneous dosing, it may also help alleviate some of the burden of haemophilia treatment for these children and their parents.”
Data from both HAVEN 1 and HAVEN 2 have been submitted for approval consideration to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for emicizumab in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A with inhibitors in September 2015. Additional studies evaluating emicizumab in people with haemophilia A both with and without inhibitors and exploring less frequent dosing regimens are ongoing.
About HAVEN 1 (NCT02622321)
HAVEN 1 is a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase III study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of emicizumab prophylaxis compared to on-demand BPA (no prophylaxis; episodic use only) in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A with inhibitors to factor VIII. The study included 109 patients (12 years of age or older) with haemophilia A with inhibitors to factor VIII, who were previously treated with BPAs on-demand or as prophylaxis. Patients previously treated with on-demand BPAs were randomised in a 2:1 fashion to receive emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm A) or no prophylaxis (Arm B). Patients previously treated with prophylactic BPAs received emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm C). Additional patients previously on BPA (on-demand or prophylaxis) were also enrolled in a separate arm (Arm D). On-demand treatment of breakthrough bleeds with BPAs was allowed per protocol in all arms.
The primary endpoint of the study is the number of treated bleeds over time with emicizumab prophylaxis (Arm A) compared with no prophylaxis (Arm B). Secondary endpoints include all bleed rate, joint bleed rate, spontaneous bleed rate, target joint bleed rate, HRQoL/ health status, intra-patient comparison to bleed rate on their prior prophylaxis regimen with BPAs (Arm C) or no prophylaxis (Arm B). The study also evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics.
A summary of the HAVEN 1 study results to be presented at ISTH is included below.