Measuring what matters

published

Patient-Reported Outcomes measure the patient perspective, and can help redefine haemophilia care.

We are in a golden age of haemophilia research and development. Advances in treatment mean that, nowadays, many patients can successfully manage their disease while maintaining their independence.

With bleed rates under better control, the community’s focus is instead shifting to what else matters most to people living with haemophilia – and how to incorporate those factors into research and day-to-day care.

“Understandably, research in haemophilia has traditionally focused on bleed rates, but these alone just don’t tell the whole story,” says Mark Skinner, a leading advocate for people living with bleeding disorders, who also himself lives with haemophilia A. “We need to start seeing how living with haemophilia affects the whole person, beyond bleeds. We need to tell the bigger story around the personal impact, the societal consequences. And to do this, we need other ways to collect data that measure the emotional effects and quality of life impact of haemophilia and of new treatment approaches, to complement the clinical picture.”

This is where Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) come in. Find out how PROs measure the patient perspective, and can help redefine haemophilia care.

Seven things you should know about PROs:

Setting up the PROBE study resulted in a validated, detailed PRO survey specifically designed for haemophilia, tested and honed through a global patient-led research network. Uniquely, parents or siblings not affected by haemophilia also completed the PROBE PRO survey. This means that researchers can look at the effect that haemophilia has on, say, education or employment, in people with a similar background. Results are grouped and assessed in a consistent way, to tease out useful patterns or trends.

During the first six years of his life, we had to go to the hospital daily, which was 30 kilometers away from our home. It took us almost four hours to inject him. It was like a job for me. I could not work at the time because it took too much time to have treatment for Michael.

Mariska

Mother of child with haemophilia A

A mother and her son stand side by side by a tranquil body of water, enjoying the serene landscape around them.

Comparing data in people with or without haemophilia, from before and after a policy change, or between two different countries, can help make a case for new specific care services or management approaches to governments and health authorities. For example, showing that patients’ mobility issues affect getting to work can provide evidence of the need for special transport services; showing how these services increase work attendance and productivity can provide evidence to support a broader policy change or inspire other countries to follow suit.

With the data we are collecting, we are looking to empower patients and patient organisations to move advocacy beyond anecdote and emotion to evidence-based arguments, to galvanise ongoing change.

Mark Skinner

President, Institute for Policy Advancement

Scientists are using PRO surveys in clinical trials to test whether a potential new medicine can improve a person’s quality of life, or whether a patient prefers the new or existing treatment. This information supplements the clinical data on safety and effectiveness, to demonstrate more fully the potential benefits of a new haemophilia treatment, and ultimately help researchers to develop medicines that can make a real difference to patients.

We all have a role to play

The landscape in haemophilia, including how we are able to gather data, is rapidly changing. The haemophilia community – patients, doctors, scientists, advocacy groups and regulatory authorities – will all need to work together to adapt to the rise of PROs and harness their potential.

That’s why Roche are providing grants to fund important PRO research – such as PROBE – to find out what matters most to people with haemophilia, and are launching awareness campaigns – such as ReDefine Haemophilia – to spark conversations around what it really means to live life with haemophilia.

References:

"Not everything that can be counted counts. Not everything that counts can be counted" : 1963, Informal Sociology, a casual introduction to sociological thinking by William Bruce Cameron, Page 13, Random House, New York.

Measuring what matters

Seven things you should know about PROs:

We all have a role to play

More stories of

Getting over the ups and downs

Haemophilia A to Z

Measuring what matters

Seven things you should know about PROs:

1. PROs reflect the patient’s own perspective of their disease.

2. PROs are a major focus for haemophilia research.

3. Research methods incorporating PROs turn patient experiences into measurable scientific data.

4. PRO data can help deliver better care.

5. PROs can help drive medical innovation.

6. PROs help doctors and patients make the right treatment decisions.

7. New technology will boost PROs and their impact.

We all have a role to play

More stories of

Getting over the ups and downs

Haemophilia A to Z